Skip to content

sysman

Software Test Report

Software Test Report¶

Project:
Author(s):
Test Date:
Source Repository/Download Link:

Source availability¶

source is publicly accessible
location is logical and easily deducible (e.g., by hierarchy, author name, or project title)

Requirements Checklist¶

Please ensure the following are provided with the software:

Documentation Review¶

Readme File¶

Link to related academic article (if applicable):
Description of the code and its purpose:
Clear list of requirements (with versions):
Step-by-step installation instructions:
Usage instructions with examples:
Description of expected output or results:
Troubleshooting section or FAQs:
Contact details:

Compilation¶

Environment Used¶

Operating System:
Compiler/Interpreter:
Other Tools/Dependencies:

Steps Taken to Compile¶

…
…

Outcome¶

Successful
Errors encountered:

Details of Errors (if any)¶

…

Testing the Software¶

Test Environment¶

Operating System:
Hardware Specifications:
Input Data Used:

Steps Followed¶

…
…

Observed Results¶

As expected
Deviations (describe):

Error Log (if applicable)¶

…

Performance Review¶

Speed:
Efficiency:
Usability:

Code Check¶

Code Comments¶

Is the code commented well enough to understand its functionality?
Are comments placed near complex logic or key functions?
Is the commenting style consistent throughout the code (e.g., single-line vs. block comments)?
Does the code include docstrings (if applicable, e.g., for Python functions)?

Unit Tests¶

Are unit tests included in the codebase?
Is there a clear structure for the tests (e.g., separate directory for tests)?
Are the tests automated and integrated into a build tool (e.g., pytest for Python, gtest for C++)?
Are there instructions on how to run the tests in the documentation?

Issues/Errors¶

Provide a detailed description of any issues, errors, or inconsistencies encountered:

…

Suggestions for Improvement¶

List any suggestions for improvement based on the test:

Optional Sections¶

Community Engagement:
- Active support channels (forums, GitHub issues, etc.):
- Response time for queries:
Licensing and Distribution:
- License clarity:
- Ease of access to the software:
- Ease of access to the data (if applicable):

Notes¶

Add any additional notes, observations, or comments here:

…

Summary¶

Overall Impression¶

Ready for broader use/publication
Requires significant improvements: